🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager could survive losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A New Soccer Order: Executives Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach only to dismiss them for playing too much that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.