🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based man has been found guilty of uploading nude segments from protected films and TV series on the social media platform Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement report obtained by BBC News, the anonymous individual posted 347 clips of nude content in a subreddit he managed, which were then viewed 4.2 million times.

The country's police state he has been handed a seven-month suspended jail term for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked clause in Denmark's copyright law, with the court ruling that by taking the scenes out of their original context, the man had damaged the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has also been found guilty of distributing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted digital content.

From spring 2022 to mid-2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit scenes including over 100 female performers.

He shared them in the forum he was a moderator of.

According to the Denmark's copyright protection organization the Rights Alliance, his online community had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were encouraged to request excerpts of specific actors.

In 2023, advocates filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the affected artists, filmmakers and production companies, which resulted in the forum being closed down.

One actress, among the performers whose nude content were shared in the group, explained to Danish broadcasters at the time she believed there was a distinction between appearing unclothed in a movie and appearing on Reddit.

The performer stated the uploads constituted "abuse".

'A significant message'

The defendant was detained in fall 2024 and admitted culpable to the allegations recently.

In a statement following the verdict, TRA head Maria Fredenslund remarked the decision sent an "important" signal "that violations of creators' entitlements have consequences".

The verdict is considered unique in the country for its use of the "ethical protections" section of the national copyright law, which states an creator's creation cannot be utilized in a way which violates their reputation.

Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova informed BBC News the legal matter was "rare" for its focus on the harm to the integrity of an artist, rather than to them financially.

How the ruling could affect other countries is unclear.

But she added there may be "an increasing number of such cases" in the future with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of one's creative output might be tempered with much more easily".