🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are remunerated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the month is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the records is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration represents how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.